There are three ways to do this and most comparisons rank them by cost, which is the wrong axis. The question that actually decides it is who is going to own the work on a Tuesday in month four.
The three options, honestly
A tool. Software that runs your buyer questions against the answer engines and reports which ones name you. Diagnosis, not treatment.
In-house. Someone on your team does the citation work, writes the pages and watches the number. Cheapest in cash, most expensive in attention.
An agency. Someone else does it and you approve. Most expensive in cash, cheapest in your time, and the quality varies more than in either of the others.
The five-minute test
Answer these four honestly.
1. Do your buyers research before they buy? Ask an assistant the five questions your customers would ask, in a logged-out session. If nobody in your category gets named, including competitors, none of the three options is worth buying yet. Come back in a year.
2. Is there a named person who will own this? Not "marketing will pick it up". A person, with the hours. If no, in-house is not an option regardless of budget, and a tool is a subscription to bad news.
3. Are you being read, or ignored? Run ten prompts and record two columns: named, and cited. If your domain appears in citations but your name does not appear in answers, your problem is off your website, and neither a tool nor more content addresses it. That is the case that most needs outside help.
4. Can you sustain six to ten hours a month, every month? Not this month. Month four, when something urgent is happening.
What the answers point at
No to question 1: do nothing yet. Recheck in six months.
Yes to 2 and 4, and question 3 says you are being ignored rather than passed over: in-house, plus a tool. This is the cheapest route that works and we say so to people who ask us. Your marketer will do most of it, and the parts they cannot do are the parts you can buy piecemeal.
No to 2 or 4: an agency, or nothing. A tool here is the expensive way to find out you were not going to act.
Question 3 says you are being read and passed over: an agency, or a deliberate campaign to be mentioned elsewhere. This is the case people most often get wrong, because everything looks fine on the website and the instinct is to publish more.
The combination most people should run
For a business with a marketing person: a one-off audit to work out which four things matter, then in-house execution, then a tool once you are tracking enough prompts that manual checking becomes the reason you stop.
That sequence puts the money where judgment is scarce, which is the prioritizing, and keeps the execution where the domain knowledge is, which is inside your business.
What each one costs you when it goes wrong
Tool that nobody acts on: a few thousand a year and a flat chart. The most common failure, and the least visible.
In-house with no owner: three months of intermittent effort, then a conclusion that AI search does not work for your category. This is the most expensive failure because of what it teaches you wrongly.
Wrong agency: six months and a five-figure sum, plus a set of pages you would not have written. Avoidable with four questions before signing.
The three costs, side by side
The comparison people usually make is tool price against agency price, which is the wrong axis. Here is the one that matters.
| Tool only | In-house plus tool | Agency | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash per month | $100 to $500 | $100 to $500 plus salary time | $2,000 to $20,000+ |
| Your hours per month | 6 to 10, if anyone has them | 6 to 10, reliably | 1 to 2, for approvals |
| Time to first diagnosis | 1 day | 1 day | 1 to 2 weeks |
| Time to first movement | Only if someone acts | 4 to 8 weeks | 2 to 6 weeks |
| Covers third-party sources | No | Partly, if they know how | Yes |
| Main failure mode | Nobody acts on it | Stops at week twelve | Wrong agency |
The row that decides it for most businesses is hours, not cash. Six to ten hours a month of a marketer's real time is the honest alternative to a retainer, and it is the number people leave out when they compare a $300 tool to a $4,000 engagement.
The second deciding row is third-party sources. If your diagnosis is cited but not named, the tool-only column cannot fix it at any price.
What the agency column actually buys
“We went from nobody finding us on AI search to being recommended in almost half of all relevant queries. I didn't think that was possible without months of work and a huge budget.
PROCERT is a building certification firm that had grown entirely on referrals. Within a couple of weeks of the work going live, someone who had never met them inquired directly through the website. Fur Magic went from absent to the most-cited brand in their category in three weeks, ahead of long-established competitors.
Both published with the starting number, the end number and the period: PROCERT and Fur Magic.
A worked example of the decision
Three businesses, same category, same month, three different right answers.
A twelve-person agency with a full-time marketer. The marketer had genuine spare capacity and wanted to own the channel. They bought a tool plus a one-off audit to prioritize. Total first-year cost a fraction of a retainer, and it worked, because the hours were real.
A forty-person manufacturer with a marketing manager running everything. Same tool, no capacity. Four months later the subscription had renewed twice and the number had not moved. They switched to done-for-you and the first movement came in week five, from claiming work nobody had had time to do.
A six-person professional services firm with no marketing function at all. Bought the one-off audit only. It told them they were cited but not named, and that the fix was external and slow. They decided to wait two quarters and revisit, which was the correct call and cost almost nothing to reach.
The pattern. The deciding variable was never budget. It was whether the hours existed, and in the third case whether the timing was right at all.
See which questions name you
A free AI visibility audit on your own buying questions, across all five answer engines.
Book your audit
Ashur Homa
Built and scaled a digital brand to $100M+ in sales with zero ad spend. Has helped businesses generate millions through AI go-to-market strategy. Leads growth at Omni Eclipse.
Connect on LinkedIn
